Why Scarlett Johansson Is Correct About Black Widow’s Return in the MCU

Scarlett Johansson recently articulated a compelling reason as to why Black Widow should not return to the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), and her perspective resonates highly with many fans. The narrative arc of Black Widow essentially concluded in Avengers: Endgame, marking an emotional milestone when she sacrificed herself on Vormir for the Soul Stone. Although the character’s past was explored further in the 2021 film Black Widow, set shortly after Captain America: Civil War, Johansson’s argument about her character’s closure remains valid.

Johansson’s Insight: A Strong Case Against Her Return as Black Widow

The Final Chapter of Black Widow’s Story

Despite being a relatively unconventional move for Marvel, Black Widow provided much-needed depth to a vital character in the MCU. Historically cast in a supporting role, Black Widow’s remarkable skills as a master assassin complemented the collective skills of a group that included a god and an indestructible rage monster. However, despite her long-standing contributions to the franchise, Johansson’s assertion about the character’s ultimate closure makes sense.

In a recent interview with Vanity Fair, Johansson reflected on her past collaborations with fellow Avengers. As she noted, while she misses them and would cherish the opportunity to reunite, she believes that “her story is complete” and expresses a desire not to complicate that closure:

“I miss my buddies and really would love to be with them forever, but… her story is complete. I don’t want to mess with that.”

This sentiment is echoed by many fans. Although other characters, like Thor and Iron Man, have either continued their arcs or have been persuaded to return, Black Widow’s story was deliberately concluded, which makes a revival feel unnecessary and potentially damaging.

The Challenge of Reviving Black Widow in the MCU

The Inescapable Reality of Her Death

Black Widow’s demise was portrayed as significant and poignant in the narrative of the MCU. Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame emphasized the weight of her sacrifice, making it clear that such a death could not be easily undone or overlooked. Despite the cinematic liberties often taken in superhero narratives, her death carried substantial emotional weight and emphasized her growth beyond merely being a supporting character.

While Marvel has employed various storytelling mechanisms, like the multiverse concept, to bring characters back, revisiting Natasha Romanoff in her original form may risk undermining the impact of her earlier storyline. The existence of a “variant” of Black Widow could fail to resonate emotionally with audiences who have invested in her authentic journey.

Continuing Black Widow’s Legacy Without Revival

Yelena Belova: The New Keeper of Her Legacy

Rather than resurrecting Black Widow, the MCU is finding a respectful way to maintain her legacy through characters like Yelena Belova and Alexei Shostakov. In the upcoming film Thunderbolts, the impact of Natasha’s absence is still felt, illustrating how her death continues to shape the stories of those she left behind.

Yelena Belova’s struggle with her sister’s void. highlights the lasting effects of Black Widow’s legacy while positioning Yelena as a potential successor within the New Avengers. This approach honors Black Widow’s memory while allowing new arcs to emerge organically and meaningfully.

I completely support Johansson’s view that Black Widow’s story should find closure and not return in a way that dilutes her character. Yelena’s development ensures that Natasha Romanoff’s influence persists in future narratives, and it is through her legacy that fans can continue to appreciate the impact of Black Widow without invoking the need for her resurrection or a variant.

    Source & Images

    © 2021 The Filibuster Blog