Overview
- Viewers have expressed disappointment regarding the animation quality and lack of detail in the debut episode of The Beginning After the End.
- Many fans noted a significant reduction in humor and a tonal shift compared to the original material.
- The adaptation has stirred controversy due to high audience expectations and frequent comparisons to the source content.
Table of Contents
The Beginning After the End, a highly anticipated anime for the spring season, has its roots in a widely praised Webtoon manhwa and light novel series. It has garnered a significant fanbase due to its compelling storyline, extensive world-building, and a fresh take on the isekai genre.
With expectations soaring for its anime adaptation, it was poised to ascend to the high bar set by its original forms. However, the show’s premiere has received a mixed reception. Commentators have expressed a myriad of concerns, leading to a current score of merely 6.6 on MyAnimeList. The question arises: have fans set their standards too high, or has the series genuinely faltered in quality?
Animation Concerns
Animation Quality Issues
One of the most prominent points of contention raised by viewers regarding The Beginning After the End lies in the animation quality presented in the first episode.
“Art style is bland and generic, it lacks detailed features on any character’s face, the emotions look fake and underwhelming, the movements are choppy and lack any weight or impact.” – Reddit user Bulky_Following_9526
While individual tastes may vary, a considerable number of fans anticipated a more vibrant animation style. The initial episodes focus heavily on world-building and character development—introducing Arthur’s life transitions rather than showcasing notable action or visual spectacle. Perhaps adding a climactic scene early on could have better captivated audiences desiring vigorous animation as a part of their introduction to the series.
“I just watched about 80% of the first episode, and I can see why this anime hasn’t generated much buzz. The animation quality was a bit lacking, and the color choices and details felt underwhelming.” – Reddit user dracoXdrayden.
Furthermore, the choice of color palette has drawn mixed reactions. The series offers a unique aesthetic, yet the muted tones can contrast sharply with vivid magical elements, leaving some viewers dissatisfied. Such choices likely aimed to reflect the darker themes of Arthur’s past, depicted through scenes of his ascent to power while juxtaposed with a brighter, more peaceful life in the present.
Tone Concerns
Humor Disappointment
Another notable concern among fans is the tonal shift observed in the first episode. Many have pointed out that the humor, which initially characterized the source material, has taken a backseat. Although some comedic moments remain, they do not resonate as strongly or frequently, detracting from the overall tone that many cherished in the original series.
The episode primarily delves into Arthur’s previous life as a king and his relationship with his parents rather than elevating comedic elements. This narrative choice aims to emphasize Arthur’s character development, leading to a poignant moment at the episode’s close where Arthur experiences emotional catharsis for the first time.
In conclusion, while The Beginning After the End has encountered some challenges aligning with fan expectations, it has ample opportunity to adapt and refine its approach in forthcoming episodes. It appears to deliver a standard isekai experience, but the high standards of its original source material ensure that fans will continue to scrutinize its shortcomings closely.
Viewers can stream The Beginning After the End on Crunchyroll.