In a recent article by Nathan Grayson on Aftermath.site, published on April 9, 2025, Twitch CEO Dan Clancy is facing backlash from employees following his controversial decision to unban popular streamer Adin Ross. Ross, whose channel was banned in February 2023, saw his account reinstated on March 29, 2025, raising questions within the organization.
Shortly after the news of the unbanning surfaced, notable Twitch figure Asmongold openly declared his disapproval, stating he would not support Ross’s return due to the streamer’s history of controversies. This public stance highlights the divisions among Twitch employees regarding the decision.
Internal Employee Concerns About the Unban
During a Twitch meeting, Clancy reportedly encountered significant opposition concerning the reinstatement. An unnamed employee challenged Clancy’s reasoning for lifting Ross’s ban, demanding clarification:
“What evidence did you evaluate that Adin Ross had reformed enough since the ban to justify him being unbanned?”
The employee expressed apprehension over the potential negative implications this decision might have on the broader streaming community. They articulated their dissent clearly:
“This is one of the decisions we’ve made that I’ve disagreed with the most. I strongly believe that this opens the wider community to harm and sends a signal that we will allow the sort of vitriol Adin has been known to perpetuate.”
Clancy’s Defense: A Second Chance Without Business Motives
In response to the criticism, Clancy reportedly emphasized that the unban was intended to offer Ross a second chance rather than being motivated by business interests. He insisted on the integrity of his decision-making process:
“I can say this emphatically to everyone: This is [in] no way, shape, or form based upon any business considerations whatsoever. This isn’t even remotely related to a business. It’s about deciding about when you can give someone a second chance – and then giving them a chance, but if they don’t live up to our expectations, we can take action.”
Clancy also clarified that Ross’s ban stemmed from multiple infractions rather than a single violation. The controversial streamer had claimed previously that his suspension was a result of displaying unmoderated chat during his broadcasts.
Clarifying Ross’s Suspension Status
Grayson’s report quotes Clancy refuting the idea that Ross’s ban was permanent. He stated that the ban was indefinite, explaining:
“Adin’s been banned for over two years. He was banned for having a certain number of strikes on his account rather than a singular offense that [led to] indefinite suspension. It’s important to note these suspensions are indefinite, not permanent.”
Furthermore, Clancy has publicly revealed his commitment to creating a “path to reinstatement” for banned streamers, a policy introduced in 2023 to improve accountability and offer opportunities for reform.
For more insights and details, you can check the full report here.