The issue of whether Jon Snow could have been legitimized in Game of Thrones prompts a significant discussion. There are compelling reasons behind Ned Stark’s decision not to pursue this path, primarily rooted in Jon’s upbringing and his status within House Stark. Despite being raised in the noble household of Winterfell, Jon Snow’s identity as a bastard left an indelible mark on his life, setting him apart from the Stark family. The series, along with George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire books, depicts a reasonably strong bond between Jon and Ned, raising questions about the absence of formal legitimization.
Legitimizing Jon would have transformed him into Jon Stark, granting him similar rights and prospects as his siblings, including Bran. However, the Stark family dynamics complicate this matter. With Robb being the eldest, he is the default heir to Winterfell. Historical precedents in Westeros show that rivalries between siblings over inheritance can lead to conflict, as seen with figures like Daemon Targaryen and Stannis Baratheon. A misstep could lead to the premature end of the firstborn’s claim, making the difference between a Stark and a Snow hold profound implications.
The Complexity of Legitimization in Westeros
Ned Stark’s Limitations Without Royal Approval
To understand the nuances of legitimizing a bastard like Jon Snow, one must consider the political landscape of Westeros. Although Ned Stark wields considerable authority as the Lord of Winterfell and Warden of the North, only the monarch of the Seven Kingdoms can legitimize a bastard. This responsibility is illustrated when Stannis Baratheon offers Jon legitimization in Season 5, an act that would carry weight had Stannis succeeded in the War of the Five Kings, despite potential contestations from opposing factions like Tommen and Cersei.
In the timeline leading up to Ned’s demise, Robert Baratheon would have held the key to Jon’s legitimacy. Given their camaraderie, Robert might have been inclined to comply. The legitimization process does not present any formal requirements; it ultimately hinges on the king’s discretion. As seen when Roose Bolton gains legitimization for Ramsay Snow, acts of favoritism from the crown can reflect political maneuvering rather than strict adherence to established norms.
Risks Associated with Seeking Robert’s Approval
The Threat of Jon’s Parentage Being Exposed
As revealed in Season 6, Jon Snow’s true parentage presents a perilous situation. The potential connection between Robert Baratheon and Jon poses serious risks. Ned’s primary motivation for adopting Jon is to protect his nephew, following a promise made to his sister, Lyanna Stark. Bringing Robert into the conversation could inadvertently lead to unwanted scrutiny regarding Jon’s origins. Given Robert’s hatred for Rhaegar Targaryen, discovery of Jon’s heritage could incite Robert’s wrath and result in a death warrant for Jon.
Requesting Robert’s legitimization would likely rekindle this delicate topic. In Season 1, Robert expresses curiosity about Jon’s mother’s identity, mistakenly believing her to be Wylla, thus allowing Ned to deftly deflect any probing questions. An attempt to legitimize Jon could force Ned to navigate a potential minefield of lies, threatening his carefully constructed facade.
Ultimately, the best strategy for Jon’s safety is to avoid drawing Robert’s attention. While growing up in high society often means facing bullying and isolation, the concealed nature of Jon’s identity allows him to remain relatively out of danger. Joining the Night’s Watch further distances Jon from Robert’s potential fury, making it a necessary strategic move.
The Fallout of Jon’s Legitimization
Succession Issues within House Stark
Beyond the immediate dangers, legitimizing Jon could introduce significant complications for House Stark. Firstly, Catelyn Stark’s animosity towards Jon is deeply rooted in her perception of him as a reminder of Ned’s supposed betrayal. Even though she comes to regret this attitude, the idea of Jon competing with Robb for claims to Winterfell and other estates would be exceedingly offensive to her. While it is uncertain whether Jon would have a stronger claim than Bran, the mere act of legitimization would instigate unnecessary controversy.
Westeros has its own criteria for succession, but these rules can often be manipulated. For instance, Ramsay Bolton, although legitimized, found his position precarious upon the announcement of his father’s new legitimate son. Despite being officially recognized, his status as a born bastard creates ongoing contention. While Jon typically avoids ambition, legitimization could awaken a desire for power or status, which might distort his fundamentally honorable nature.
Ned Stark’s Ideals and Jon’s Identity
Upholding the Truth over Deception
Ned Stark places immense value on his honor, often prioritizing it above all else. His willingness to risk his daughters’ safety for the sake of truth illustrates this steadfast commitment. Acknowledging Jon as a bastard, albeit inconvenient, is not uncommon amongst the noble families of Westeros. However, Ned is consciously misrepresenting Jon’s status, as he is technically not a Stark but rather a Targaryen according to the law.
To have Jon legitimized would deepen this charade, something Ned likely would resist. He is not inclined to foster lies or complicate matters through deception. Thus, legitimizing Jon would conflict with his principles, going against the basic promise he made to Lyanna. Ned’s actions have thus far been designed to honor a sacred pledge, but any further deceit would exceed his moral boundaries.