WARNING: Spoilers ahead for Law & Order: SVU season 26, episode 17, “Accomplice Liability.”
Amanda Rollins’ (Kelli Giddish) brief return in Law & Order: SVU season 26, episode 17, titled “Accomplice Liability,”continues a troubling pattern observed this season. Rollins, a character renowned for her complexity and depth, graced some of the most memorable episodes from seasons 13 through 24. Despite her popularity, the show’s creators chose to write her out mid-way through her final season, sending her character off to teach forensic science at Fordham University. Yet, she has made sporadic cameo appearances as a consultant for her former squad.
The narrative surrounding Rollins’ exit was disappointing, lacking coherence, as it failed to align with her established character traits; prior to her departure, there were no suggestions that she had any inclination toward teaching. This season, Law & Order: SVU attempted to rectify this by repositioning her character from an educator back to law enforcement, where she is now affiliated with the Intelligence Unit. However, her appearances have been minimal, as she has only been depicted at her workplace in one of her four recent guest spots, with the others focusing on providing emotional support to Carisi—who is grappling with being held hostage during a robbery and the aftermath of his trauma.
Rollins’ Limited Appearances in Law & Order: SVU Undermine Her Character Development
From Strong Independent Woman to Supporting Character
Amanda Rollins resonated with viewers due to her fierce independence intertwined with a longing for acceptance. This nuanced character evolved over her journey from Atlanta to New York, attempting to escape her traumatic past, including a sexual assault. Throughout her tenure, Rollins grapples with significant personal challenges, such as a gambling addiction and her turbulent relationship with her younger sister Kim (Lindsay Pulsipher). Despite developing a close bond with Benson (Mariska Hargitay), the narrative post her exit starkly contrasts her multi-faceted persona.
Since her departure, Rollins has transitioned from a job she loathed to one she enjoys—yet her new role remains largely unseen. Her recent appearances have relegated her to serving as an extension of Carisi’s narrative, focusing on his emotional recovery rather than depicting her independent journeys. While Rollins’ concern for her husband is understandable, it reduces her character to merely a supportive spouse, overshadowing the vibrant independence that once defined her.
The Inconsistency Between Rollins’ Cameo Appearances and SVU’s Core Message
Undermining Her Survivor Narrative
Law & Order: SVU has consistently focused on uplifting survivors of sexual assault, using its platform to empower real-life individuals facing similar struggles. Rollins’ original storyline showcased the resilience of a survivor who, despite facing numerous setbacks, pursued personal growth and recovery. However, her recent appearances primarily emphasize her relationship with Carisi, which directly contradicts the empowering essence of her early character arc.
This disconnect is glaring in the episode “Accomplice Liability,”where the narrative prioritizes Carisi’s perspective over that of Tess, a fellow survivor. By centering on Carisi’s emotional journey while relegating Tess’s experience to the background, the storyline sends a concerning message about the relative importance of their traumas. Furthermore, Rollins’ seemingly obligatory cameo to support Carisi reinforces the notion that his struggles take precedence over the experiences of other survivors, undermining the series’ original intent.
Maximizing the Impact of Rollins’ Cameos in Law & Order: SVU
Expanding Rollins’ Narrative Beyond a Supportive Role
While it is credible for Rollins to be present during Carisi’s traumatic experiences, Law & Order: SVU could develop her character in ways that transcend her role as a supportive spouse. Introducing plotlines where Rollins grapples with guilt over her work obligations during Carisi’s trial, or utilizing her job insights to acquire crucial information on the defendant, could provide her character with a more compelling narrative arc that viewers would appreciate.
Simply featuring Rollins in fleeting cameos may alienate dedicated viewers who have come to love her character. To retain audience interest, the show should grant Rollins meaningful storylines that reflect her complexity, rather than relegating her to mere background roles. By doing so, they can ensure her appearances resonate more significantly, rather than frustrating fans and driving them away from the series.
Interested in more engaging content? Click below to subscribe to our weekly Network TV newsletter, and gain exclusive insights from actors and showrunners about your favorite shows.