Anticipation is building for the much-awaited sequel, 28 Years Later, directed by Danny Boyle and written by Alex Garland. This new installment aims to introduce a trilogy set almost three decades after the iconic original film. Recent updates hint at the potential return of Cillian Murphy’s character, Jim, leading some fans to speculate about darker possibilities for the storyline. While the 2002 horror classic concluded on a note of hope, its alternate endings painted a far grimmer picture. The sequel appears to align with the original theatrical release, maintaining Jim’s survival through the tumultuous events.
Initially, there were doubts regarding Murphy’s participation in this new chapter. The first trailer raised eyebrows when a fleeting image appeared to show an emaciated figure resembling a zombie, prompting speculation about Jim’s fate. However, it has since been confirmed that this figure is not Jim. Despite his absence from the current cast list, a recent comment from Boyle has ignited new hope among fans that Jim’s journey might continue as the trilogy unfolds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcvLKldPM08
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcvLKldPM08
Cillian Murphy’s Potential Return: A Hint Toward Jim’s Story
Danny Boyle Hints at Cillian Murphy’s Return

During the 2025 CinemaCon, attended by ScreenRant, Boyle unveiled a new trailer for 28 Years Later while suggesting that Murphy might reprise his role in future sequels. He remarked, “…like all good things in life, you may have to wait a little while for him to make his appearance.” This statement implies that while Jim may not feature prominently in 28 Years Later, the character could indeed resurface in the anticipated 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple or subsequent installments.
If Jim does make a return, it would mark a pivotal moment in the franchise’s evolution. Cillian Murphy has transformed from an emerging actor into a prominent star since the release of 28 Days Later. Given his status, it seems unlikely he would appear merely as a supporting character; a substantial comeback would necessitate thoughtful narrative development. Therefore, it stands to reason that the sequel may lay groundwork for Jim’s return, even if only hinted at.
Theories Surrounding Cillian Murphy’s Role: A Dark Turn?
A Troubled Journey for Jim From the Original Film

Recent insights from the 28 Years Later trailer have led fans to speculate about a character named “Jimmy,”possibly an allusion to Jim. Images showcasing the name in eerie contexts—a building wall and etched into the body of an Infected person—have fueled theories that he might have taken a darker path. Despite surviving the horrors of the military estate in the original film, Jim could have succumbed to despair or become morally twisted over the years.
The trailer is rife with unsettling imagery—such as a skull forest and graffiti—which evokes the idea that Jim may have evolved into a cult leader of sorts. If this theory holds, it could place Jim at the center of the conflict in the trilogy, possibly positioning him as the main antagonist against characters played by Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and Ralph Fiennes.
Potential Teases for Cillian Murphy’s Return: A Must-Have?
A Crucial Turning Point for the Series
The buzz surrounding Jim’s potential return has intensified, particularly after the announcement of 28 Years Later, amplified by Murphy’s recent critical acclaim for his role in Oppenheimer. Given the creative force of Danny Boyle and Alex Garland behind this trilogy, it’s hard to believe they would exclude Murphy, especially with the intriguing reference to “Jimmy”in the trailer.
It appears increasingly likely that Jim’s return is not a matter of *if*, but *when*. Following Boyle’s CinemaCon hint, the upcoming sequel could serve as a precursor to Jim’s re-entry into the narrative, whether as a hero or a villain. Based on the atmospheric content within the trailer, a dark evolution for his character seems almost inevitable.